Retired from Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Italy
Received Date: 17/03/2023; Published Date: 09/06/2023
*Corresponding author: Claudio Bazzi, Retired from Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Via Pio II, 3, Milan, Italy
Background: In chronic glomerulonephritis (GN) the patients have different types of renal lesions: the more frequent lesions are: Global Glomerular Sclerosis evaluated by percentage (GGS%); Tubulo- Interstitial-Damage evaluated by a score: tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration graded 0, 1 or 2 if absent, focal or diffuse (TID global score: 0-6); Arteriolar Hyalinosis evaluated by a score: 0, 1, 2, 3 if absent, focal, diffuse, diffuse with lumen reduction, respectively (AH global score 0- 3). The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of outcome and high blood pressure according to the data of different severity in each type of renal lesion.
Methods: 363 patients were evaluated according to GGS%, 362 according to TID score, 361 according to AH score.
Results: Remission was 76% in patients with AH score=0; 80% in patients with TID score =0; 81% in patients with GGS % =0. Progression to ESRD was 48% in patients with TID score 5+6, 45% in GGS≥50% and 12% in AH score=3. The frequency of high blood pressure (BP1) was 38% vs 81% in AH =0 vs AH=3; 70% vs 86% in patients with TID score=0 vs TID score 5+6; 32% vs 83% in GGS=0% and GGS≥50%. In every type of renal lesion, the patients with remission and progression to ESRD are very different for baseline and last eGFR and for all proteinuric parameters.
Conclusion: In chronic glomerulonephritis and nephroangiosclerosis the different degrees of severity that characterize evry single renal lesion are a very simple and useful marker for prediction of functional outcome and high blood pressure frequency in comparison to renal lesion as such.
The key role of renal lesions assessed by renal biopsy for CKD progression is widely recognized. In patients with glomerulonephritis are present different types of renal lesions; the more frequent are : Global Glomerular Sclerosis evaluated by percentage (GGS%), Tubulo-Interstitial-Damage valuable by a score of severity: tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration graded 0, 1 or 2 if absent, focal or diffuse (TID global score: 0-6); Arteriolar Hyalinosis evaluated by a score: 0, 1, 2, 3 if absent, focal, diffuse, diffuse with lumen reduction, respectively (AH global score 0-3). The role of each renal lesion may be considered as such or taking into account that each type of lesion includes different degree of severity that are useful to identify different percentages of the various outcomes. In the majority of previous studies, the prediction of functional outcome was mainly based on urinary excretion of various types of proteins with different molecular weight (2-28). To my knowledge no one publication evaluated the clinical significance of the different degree of severity of renal lesion. Aim of this study is to assess which is the percentage of the main functional outcome [Remission and Progression to ESRD] according to the different severity that characterizes evry renal lesions. The patients with 0 value in any type of renal lesion are associated with the highest percentage of Remission: 81% in GGS%=0, 80% in TID score=0, 76% in AH score=0; ESRD is 52% in TID score 5+6, 45% in GGS≥50% and 12% in AH score=3. The outcomes Remission and ESRD in each type of renal lesion are characterized by different values of clinical parameters such as age, baseline and last eGFR, percentage of GGS, values of TID and AH score, excretion of total proteinuria (TUP/C) and of proteins of different molecular weight.
The patient’s cohort included in the study was not selected. The patients attending the Nephrology and Dialysis Unit of San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy, between January 1992 and April 2006 with renal biopsy diagnosis of GN were 469; the patients with acute reversible renal failure (ARF) at biopsy were excluded from analysis as do not meet the inclusion criterion (chronic glomerulonephritis); for the objective of the present study were selected only the patients with a follow up and outcome; thus 363 patients were the object of this study with the following types of chronic primary glomerulonephritis (GN), Nephroangiosclerosi (n. 20) and Lupus Nephritis (LN n. 36; [WHO classes: 3+5 n. 5, 4 n. 16; 5 n. 5, 3 n. 5, 2 n. 5)], (Table 1): Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS, n. 38), Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (IMN, n. 81), Minimal change disease (MCD, n. 12), Membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN, n. 18); IgA nephropathy (IgAN, n. 124), Crescentic IgAN (CIgAN, n. 34), Nephroangosclerosis (n. 20). Inclusion criteria: at least six glomeruli in renal biopsy; typical features at light and immunofluorescence microscopy; no clinical signs of secondary GN except for LN. The patients evaluated by TID score are 362, by GGS% are 363 and by Arteriolar Hyalinosis score are 361. The functional outcome was available for the 361-363 patients with rather long follow up: mean 74±60 months (12-354). Four types of outcomes were considered: 1) Remission 2) progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD); 3) eGFR reduction ≤ 50% of baseline). We decided to consider as outcomes Remission and ESRD. Diagnosis and clinical presentation of patients are reported in Table 1.
Table 1: Diagnosis of patients included in the study and comparison between normal and high blood pressure.
Proteinuria was measured in 24 hours urine collection and second morning urine sample by the Coomassie blue method (modified with sodium-dodecyl-sulphate) and expressed as 24/hour proteinuria and protein creatinine/ratio (mg urinary protein/g urinary creatinine: UP/C). Serum and urinary creatinine were measured enzymatically and expressed in mg/dL. Urinary albumin IgG and α1-microglobulin (α1m) were measured by immunonephelometry and expressed as urinary protein/creatinine ratio (IgG/C, Alb/C, α1m/C). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was measured by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula (1). Three types of renal lesions as markers of disease severity were evaluated: percentage of glomeruli with global glomerulosclerosis (GGS%); extent of tubulo-interstitial damage (TID) evaluated semi-quantitatively by a score: tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration graded 0, 1 or 2 if absent, focal or diffuse (TID global score: 0-6) and extent of Arteriolar Hyalinosis (AH) evaluated semiquantitatively by a score: 0, 1, 2, 3 if absent, focal, diffuse, diffuse with lumen reduction, respectively (AH global score 0- 4) (Table 2).
Table 2: Functional Outcome and High Blood Pressure according to Arteriolar Hyalinosis (AH) score, Tubulo-interstitial damage (TID) score and percentages of Global Glomerular Sclerosis (GGS%).
Remission was 76% in patients with AH score=0; 80% in patients with TID scor =0; 81% in patients with GGS %=0. Progression to ESRD was 48% in patients with TID score 5+6, 45% in GGS≥50% and 12% in AH score 3. The frequency of high blood pressure (BP1) was 38% vs 81% in AH =0 vs AH=3; 70% vs 86% in patients with TID score=0 vs TID score 5+6; 32% vs 83% in GGS=0% and GGS≥50%. In evry type of renal lesion the patients with remission were very different from patients with ESRD for baseline and last eGFR and for all proteinuric parameters.
Table 3: Percentages of Remission and progression to ESRD in patients according to Arteriolar hyalinosis score (n.361).
Table 4: Percentages of Remission and progression to ESRD in patients accoding to Tubulo-interstitial damage score (TID score n. 363 patients).
Table 5: Percentages of Remission and progression to ESRD in patients according to Tubulo-Interstitial Damage score (TID score n. 363 patients).
Table 6: Percentages of Remission and progression to ESRD according to percentage of Global Glomerular Sclerosis (GGS% n. 361 patients).
Table 7: Functional outcome in 67 patients with IMN, 35 with FSGS and 14 with MPGN according to Arteriolar Hyalinosis score.
Table 8: Functional outcome according to renal lesions (AH sc., TID sc., GGS%) in combination.
Table 9: Percentage of high blood pressure according to quartiles of IgG/C and α1m/C.
Comparison of patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) and patients with non-nephrotic proteinuria (PP).
Table 10: Functional outcome in 67 patients with IMN, 35 with FSGS and 14 with MPGN according to Comparison of Remission and ESRD between patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome (NS: KI). according to: no therapy, teraphy with Steroids and Cyclophosphamide and teraphy with only steroids.
The prediction of functional outcome and responsiveness to treatments in GN patients is of paramount importance in clinical practice. Several studies in last decades evaluated the predictive power of functional outcome of several proteinuric and novel molecular biomarkers but none of them reached 100% prediction. The identification of a new simple marker with high outcome prediction would be very useful also to assess responsiveness to new therapies introduced recently.
The 3 types of renal lesions considered in this study are all characterized by increasing severity that is for Global Glomerular Sclerosis the percentage of GGS; for Tubulo-Interstitial-Damage the evaluation of a score from 0 to 6 (indicated in the methods paragraph); also Arteriolar hyalinosis is evaluated by a score from 0 to 3 (indicated in methods paragraph); the various markers of severity of each type of renal lesion are a very simple predictors of functional outcome and percentage of high blood pressure.